Unspoiled nature

„The regions where man-made climate change has the most devastating impact are often places that humans hardly ever visit. Which shows how closely everything here on our planet is interconnected. And how important it is to have climate action that takes a broad-based approach. With cross-sector solutions as well as with commitment from politicians and society in general.“


Climate neutrality by 2050 – this is only possible with us

For a long time, discussions on curbing climate change focused entirely on energy and transport. The EU’s Green Deal has finally taken into account just how much the achievement of their plan, namely for Europe to be climate neutral by 2050, relies on the circular economy. Also – and precisely because – we are particularly good at reducing our emissions.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by the circular economy were slashed by 70% between 1990 and 2010. The Federal Ministry for the Environment believes this figure will have reached 91% by 2030. As a comparison: emissions of climate-damaging gases in Germany as a whole fell by just 27% between 1990 and 2014.1 What makes the role of the circular economy so important, however, is that it has a positive impact on practically all other climate-relevant sectors.

How we help others to protect the climate

Energy sector

The circular economy’s contribution: producing climate-friendly energy from waste

Transport sector

The circular economy’s contribution: alternative fuels, recycling solutions in the area of e-mobility

Industrial sector

The circular economy’s contribution: closed-loop solutions, supplying recycled raw materials

Construction sector

The circular economy’s contribution: substitute building products from recycling operations, climate-friendly recycling of residual materials

Politically and socially engaged

REMONDIS in particular, and the circular economy in general, have always been very aware of both their role and their responsibilities when it comes to taking action to curb climate change. We have been campaigning for decades now to make both politicians and the general public more aware of subjects such as conserving natural resources and cutting GHG emissions. The fact of the matter is that the effectiveness of the circular economy does not lie in our hands alone. Even the most innovative recycling technologies cannot develop their full climate protection potential, if a lack of political guidelines means that there are no customers for the recycled raw materials or that recyclable materials fail to make it to recycling facilities because of inadequate collection schemes.

Which is why we see it as one of our tasks to make children and teenagers more aware of this subject and to show them how to handle recyclable materials responsibly. Over ten years ago, we launched our award-winning educational programme THE RECYCLING PROFESSIONALS to do just this.

So where’s climate action heading now? Baby penguins don’t need to understand why greenhouse gases are bad for the climate. They just want to grow up in an intact environment in the Antarctic. We humans, though, should certainly busy ourselves with the question of how carbon emissions can be reduced. And as early as possible. Which is one of the reasons why REMONDIS launched its ‘THE RECYCLING PROFESSIONALS’ project.

Our efforts to secure an international landfill ban

For years now, we have been calling for a Europe-wide implementation of the TASi, a German law that bans organic waste materials from being sent to landfill anywhere in the country. Such a move would reduce emissions caused by the European circular economy by two-thirds in one fell swoop.2 The reason why this measure would be so extraordinarily effective: landfills containing organic waste primarily emit methane – a greenhouse gas that is 25 times more damaging than CO2!

But there are other reasons besides the TASi that demand that the subject of landfills be put on the climate action agenda. There are millions and millions of rubbish tips all around the world where waste is simply being dumped and left exposed to the elements. There are very few other circumstances that have a more damaging effect on our climate. The waste at these sites is often burned on bonfires – something that not only releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere but also toxins, endangering the lives of the local inhabitants.

The study ‘What a Waste 2.0’ concludes that 33% of all waste that is sent to landfill or incinerated across the world could actually be recycled.

The battle against climate change is also a battle against the world’s unmanaged waste tips

The study What a Waste 2.0 (PDF)

Our efforts to secure a raw material efficiency label

If the climate goals are to be achieved, then it is essential that we not only switch from fossil fuels to renewables but also from virgin raw materials to recycled raw materials. Nowhere is this clearer than in the Ecodesign Directive, in which the subject of raw material efficiency plays no role whatsoever despite it being so very relevant. Being a representative of the circular economy, we are calling for this situation to be improved and for the Ecodesign Directive to be extended.

Based on the well-known system used for depicting energy efficiency and labelling food, we have developed a raw material efficiency label that can be used on all types of product. This label provides information about how recyclable an article is and how much recycled material was used to make it. This helps consumers decide how sustainable a product is and producers are given the opportunity to document their commitment to promoting ecodesign.

What the recycling label communicates

Living in harmony with nature. This also means giving back to nature everything that belongs to it. In other words: if we can’t live entirely without landfills, then we should at least pursue a concept that returns some of the area to nature. Our goal remains, though, to have a society where landfilling waste is no longer needed and all materials can be recycled for reuse.

Our efforts to secure minimum recycled content

The fight against climate change is also a fight for a greater acceptance of recycled raw materials among manufacturers. As far as climate action is concerned, it is of little help to have the circular economy recover large volumes of raw materials, if these are then not systematically used to manufacture new products. This is precisely the situation that we are facing at the moment.

At present, just 15% of the input materials deployed by manufacturers are recyclates3. Which means 85% are virgin raw materials, which have a far worse record as far as conserving natural resources and reducing carbon emissions are concerned.

There is a huge potential here to help curb climate change – potential that is being wasted unnecessarily and on a grand scale. We believe there is an urgent need for recycled content mandates in order to bring an end to this situation. What’s more, the amount of minimum recycled content should be gradually increased over the coming years. Minimum recycled content not only ensures that CO2 emissions are reduced. It also acts as a catalyst on the circular economy: the more recyclate that is used, the greater and more stable the demand for the material will be. This, in turn, gives the circular economy the confidence it needs to plan ahead and invest in new and better recycling technologies.

The self-reinforcing effect of minimum recycled content

Our efforts to promote green steel

The enormously energy-intensive steel industry is one of the biggest carbon emitters around. And so, with the EU's climate goals in mind, it is no surprise that the industry is working flat out to become more climate friendly. Many are talking about achieving this by using green hydrogen to power their plants. The only problem here: it will take years before there is enough green hydrogen available to cover their requirements. Which means faster solutions are needed. One such solution is to focus on the materials steelmakers use rather than on their energy and has been put forward by the circular economy. By REMONDIS' company TSR to be precise, a business specialising in metal recycling. It transforms scrap steel into a recycled product called TSR 40.

Its advantage over normal scrap steel: TSR 40 is of such a high quality that a far greater amount of it can be used to produce steel. 25% and more instead of the 15% that is normally the case. And if you take into account that every tonne of scrap steel used reduces CO2 emissions by up to 4.3 tonnes, it very quickly becomes clear just what a big step forward this is towards achieving green steel.

TSR40: CO2 savings per tonne of scrap steel

Our goal is to take action ourselves to curb climate change as well as to get others to join in

„It is crucial that the landfill ban introduced by Germany for organic waste is implemented across the whole of Europe. The medium-term goal must be to ban all untreated municipal waste from being sent to landfill as these materials are one of the main sources of climate-damaging methane.“


„We must begin using the recycling label. And preferably today rather than tomorrow. Why? Because it will help to drive forward the transition from virgin to recycled raw materials and enable consumers to see how recyclable the products actually are.“


„Every single gram of recycled raw material used to make new products helps. Which is why we have been calling for minimum recycled content mandates for a long while – mandates that should then be steadily increased.“


„Initiatives are needed from everyone. Consumers have a responsibility here as do politicians and industry. Everyone needs to work together.“


Some more facts for you to read up on